Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Continuous table #34031

    That’s the same as you get with regular text. Read the online Help for how to thread text frames: https://helpx.adobe.com/indesign/using/threading-text.html

    in reply to: Continuous table #34029

    Tables do that automatically. But they only break on *rows*, not inside a cell. Possibly you have a tall single cell somewhere; to let ID break “inside” you’ll have to manually split it first.

    in reply to: GREP to grab consecutive paragraphs of text #33962

    I guess it is failing for you because by default, GREP only works on single paragraps. You can force it to consider multi-paragraph matches by prepending the flag (?s) — this switches off “single line mode”.
    Try something like this:

    (?s)^<t>((?!\r<).)+

    This should match any sequence of single characters (including hard returns) where “the next match” does not equal a hard return plus a new “<” start-of-next-tag marker.

    You can apply your new paragraph styles this way, and in a second loop remove the ‘used’ <t> markers. I don’t think it’s safe to try both at the same time. Then again, from within a script this ought to be fast nevertheless.

    in reply to: Shape drawn in ID not converting to PDF #33940

    Can you check to which Acrobat *version* you are exporting? The lower versions don’t support combinations of buttons and transparency (heaven knows why). Usually you get a reminder about that on exporting, but I think it’s one of those warnings you can click to “Never show again”.

    You can try upping the Acrobat version to the max and see if that helps.

    in reply to: Image size and resolution #33924

    > I know there is a preflight option to check for images that are not at their original proportions, but that?s not what I need.

    Correct. “Proportions” don’t say anything about an image’s resolution.
    The option that you DO need is under “IMAGES and OBJECTS”, “Image Resolution”, then check all three of Colour, Grayscale, and 1-bit Image Minimum resolution and fill in your preferred values.

    > Oh yes, and am I right in assuming that just clicking the loaded cursor should place an image at 100% of its original size?

    Yes, usually that’s the case. But at times I have found InDesign mis-reading the resolution information inside images, and, for example, got something interpreted as “1 dpi”. So suddenly an image placed at “100%” was 20 square meters large — according to InDesign.

    If you are going to resize figures anyway, you might as well not click-and-place but click-drag-a-box instead, when placing a new image. After placing, you can always check the dpi in the Info panel and/or the scaling in the Control panel.

    in reply to: Selecting just the subtitle #33923

    Usually, situations like these can be solved with a *lookbehind* string in GREP — but you cannot use lookbehind for a text of variable length. So this

    (?<=TITLE.+\r\r).+(?=\r\r)

    will *not* work. But maybe you can do it in reverse:

    1. First apply your subtitle paragraph style to

    ^TITLE.+\r\r.+(?=\r\r)

    2. Then apply your title paragraph style to just

    ^TITLE

    in reply to: CorelDraw to Illustrator to InDesign #33787

    What happens when you drop an .AI file onto the Distiller?

    in reply to: Calculate in tabels #33746

    > I can?t get to multiply wit comma figures (2,3 or 2.3) non of them will work it just multiply wit the first figure (2)

    That script works for me. Pick *either* the comma or the full stop as your decimal settings. Then check the setting in the main script dialog under “Numbers are formatted as” — select the correct format for your numbers. You do *not* have to have the same thousands’ group separation character, only the decimal separator.

    On your sample text “comma figures (2,3 or 2.3) non of them”, multiplying by 10, with the top option (decimal point):

    comma figures (230 or 23) non of them

    and the bottom option (decimal comma):

    wit comma figures (23 or 230) non of them

    .. both seem to work as expected.

    in reply to: Figures won't turn to lining #33710

    That font is Scala Sans, but I cannot see whether it’s the normal variant or the Pro — “Pro” has Lining Figures.

    Zajormita, can you check if you see Lining Figures in the Glyphs panel for this font? If you do and you hover the mouse over one, does it say something like “lnum” in the pop-up?
    Another way is to check the regular numbers in the Glyphs panel. If they have alternate forms, they have a small triangle in the lower right of the square the number is in. Click the triangle and gold down the mouse to see what those alternates are.

    in reply to: how to draw an exactly vertical line #53588

    It’s a basic operation, and there are lots of ways to do this.

    Per mouse: Click at the starting point, hold down shift, and click near the end point. This seems to be the recommended way, as it is mentioned in the Online Help.
    Using the Control panel: draw any straight line. Select the first anchor point with the white arrow and look in the panel for its coordinates. Copy the value you want to stay the same; select the end point, and paste this in the control panel.
    By eye: drag a ruler guide to the desired horizontal or vertical position. Then, using the Pen tool, point-and-click near the desired positions for start and end. If “Snap to Guides” is enabled, the new points will automatically snap into position.
    The Roundabout Way: draw a rectangle and, using the Pen tool, delete two of the four points.

    in reply to: diacritics: tweaking appearances of ? #64466

    “Without utilizing third-party scripts” — why? Do you prefer having to write such scripts yourself?

    Anyway: InDesign does not have a 'preference' or a 'preset' for the vertical position of diacritics. All that Peter's (free!) script does for your n-tilde and e-acute is retrieving the correct single character from your font, and the way it looks on your screen is the way the font is designed. It's a single glyph, and you cannot somehow “move up” a part of it with InDesign — not without converting the character to outlines, at least. The vertical position is, in this case, determined by the font designer.

    An alternative is to use separate “n” and tilde character, and “e” and acute character. In most fonts, the tilde and acute are available as single codes; then, all you have to do is kern them to the left (as these are typically “spacing”), and use Baseline Shift to move it as high as your client desires.

    (this work-around simply not practical enough).

    I'm afraid there is no “practical” way to do this. You might try to convince your client that this is the way the font is designed.

    InDesign does not have that functionality.

    Easy. Use this:

    ^.+?:

    It comes down to this:

    ^ from the start of a paragraph ..

    . match any character ..

    + .. as much as possible ..

    ? .. and then the shortest match ..

    : .. up to a colon.

    The '?' is necessary here because without it, the '+' would match as much as possible, all the way up to the very last colon in a single paragraph.

    Hmm, ha-hum. Hmmmm . . . :)

    Okay — I think I know what causes this error. Do you have some overset text, and does it contain an anchored frame as well? In that case the frame is not visible, so there are no 'bounds' to be measured. And you'd never notice it because you can't see that frame.

    Try this Javascript (on a copy!). First make sure your measurement units are in points! Or else it will try to work in centimeters or inches, or what-have-you-got, and it may even do something — but not what you wanted it to.

    It first gathers all 'pageItems' that are 'inside stories', which is what an anchored object actually is. Then it calls a small helper function that determines if the height (as given by geometricBounds) is in the neighborhood of your 25.337 pts. It needs a bit of a fuzzy comparison, because InDesign doesn't really show all fourteen decimals it internally uses — your anchored object may in fact be 25.336999999 pts high, and comparing it against exactly 25.337 would return “false”!

    Then, if a match is found, it uses the 'add to' subfunction of the 'resize' method to add 4.903 pts.

    allAnchObjects = app.activeDocument.stories.everyItem().pageItems.everyItem().getElements();
    for (i=0; i<allAnchObjects.length; i++)
    {
    if (isRightHeight (allAnchObjects[i]))
    {
    allAnchObjects[i].resize (
    BoundingBoxLimits.GEOMETRIC_PATH_BOUNDS,
    AnchorPoint.TOP_LEFT_ANCHOR,
    ResizeMethods.ADDING_CURRENT_DIMENSIONS_TO,
    [ 0, 4.903 ]);
    }
    }

    function isRightHeight (object)
    {
    var h = object.geometricBounds[2]-object.geometricBounds[0];
    if (h > 25.336 && h < 25.338)
    return true;
    return false;
    }

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,338 total)