*** From the Archives ***

This article is from October 21, 2009, and is no longer current.

Review: Alien Skin Bokeh

Bokeh also offers vignetting tools to further draw focus to the center of your image. Of course, you can also vignette in Photoshop using the Lens Correction filter, but it’s nice to be able to work with both shallow depth of field and vignette at the same time.
Is Bokeh Right For You?
At $199, Bokeh is not cheap. While the plug-in does what it claims to do, and does it very well, there may often be practical limitations on its usefulness. Perhaps your foreground subject is simply too difficult to mask, or maybe you have a shot that just can’t be masked properly to achieve a realistic depth of field effect. These situations are more common than you might imagine.
Shallow depth of field is a great way to bring more attention to your subject, but for this plug-in to work well, your subject needs to be on a very well-defined plane, separate from your background, and it needs to be a plane that is easily selected.
If you often shoot with a point-and-shoot camera, Bokeh might be more useful than if you shoot with an SRL, because point-and-shoot cameras are limited in how shallow their depth of field can be due to their tiny sensors. However, you’ll still face the same masking challenges.
In the end, you may find it’s easier and more cost-effective to get your shallow depth of field effects the old-fashioned way: shooting with wide apertures and careful camera placement.
Obviously, you might not always be able to achieve such an effect in-camera, or you may not realize you need it until you get home. For these times, Bokeh can be a lifesaver, if the image is one that allows for a good selection. You’ll simply have to decide for yourself if you encounter these situations often enough to justify the $200 price.
 


Previous 1 2

James Fritz is a Principal Program Manager: Content Tools and Workflows at LinkedIn.
  • Anonymous says:

    Excellent analysis. I didn’t realize the difference between true depth of field and blur.
    Thanks!

  • Anonymous says:

    An excellent and balanced article, clearly written and well illustrated.

    Ed Gold

  • Anonymous says:

    Ben,

    I would be interested to know what your take is on the entire Alien Skin Photo Bundle, which includes Bokeh, and whether it’s worth the price. I kind of agree with you that Bokeh by itself for $200 might be a bit much… considering how much work one has to put into selecting and masking… but if the whole Photo Bundle of Exposure, Image Doctor, Blow Up, Snap Art & Bokeh are worth the $500 price tag… that might be the way to go. If each plug-in by itself is only marginally useful, then it might be something to pass on, but if at least 2 or 3 of the plug-ins are worth buying at full price, then the bundle would be a good way to go.

    Thanks!

  • Anonymous says:

    Exposure is definitely a very nice product. It’s film stock simulation is very good, and even though Photoshop CS4 has an excellent black and white conversion feature, Exposure’s tools are still very useful. I have not used the latest Image Doctor or Snap Art yet, so I fear I can’t comment on those, but Blow Up is also a good product. But, if you don’t tend to do a lot of enlargements, it may be of only moderate use. So that’s a tough call. You’re just gonna have to try to decide how much you need these various functions.

  • Anonymous says:

    Great article! I’m actually surprised at how good Alienskin bokeh plugin is!
    If you would like to make your own custom bokeh shape filter I have a tutorial here:
    https://www.pompo.com/2010/01/20/how-to-make-your-own-custom-made-bokeh-filter/

  • Anonymous says:

    The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesn’t disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I actually thought you’d have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you Palio could fix if you weren’t too busy looking for attention.

  • >