*** From the Archives ***

This article is from March 9, 2012, and is no longer current.

Glamour Magazine Limits Photoshop Use

The controversy about retouching photographs isn’t new. In an age where everyone has access to Photoshop, retouching photos is expected. Judging by the covers of many magazines, the world is full of physically perfect people — everyone, that is, except us. But lately questions have arisen about how much Photoshop is too much.
Now Glamour magazine has decided to rage against the Photoshop machine,” as women’s fashion website Refinery29.com cheekily put it. Glamour polled 1,000 of its readers, asking “How Much is Too Much?” “Only 43 percent of women said it was OK for magazines to retouch, and just 39 percent were comfortable with ads doing so,” reported Glamour when the results were published in its February issue. In other word 60 percent don’t want ads to mislead them with impossibly blond hair or spookily blue eyes. Another Gamour report finding revealed that “slimming a body to look even five pounds lighter” was approved by only 22 percent” of those polled — that’s 78 percent opposed.
Based on this information, Glamour took a stance: “as your responses make clear, retouching has its limits—or should—and Glamour plans to take a stronger role in setting ours.” A pimple or wrinkle may be removed, but making a celebrity impossibly thin or otherwise altering the face or physique of its models will no longer be tolerated at Glamour, even if the celebrity asks for it.

Glamour used these before and after photos to show the extent to which Photoshop can change an image.
It’s good to see Glamour drawing a line. For a magazine that mocks real women in its “Do’s and Don’ts” feature, it’s a step in the right direction.
The examples of celebrities and models who have gone under the Photoshop-knife only to be unrecognizable or even disfigured are numerous. The Web is full of freakish photos of women missing hands or having Barbie-doll-sized waists. But we’re not talking about Photoshop butchery. It’s the photos that are retouched by skilled artisans that are dangerous in that they relay perfection that is unobtainable for, well, almost everyone. When a famously fit woman like
Madonna is digitally altered
you have to wonder how far is too far. Now we’re telling girls that even if you are a slim, toned, yoga-loving superstar, it’s still not good enough.
Adobe has long been aware of the issue. The American Medical Association adopted a policy that said, in part, that advertisers need to “discourage the altering of photographs in a manner that could promote unrealistic expectations of appropriate body image.” When ABC News aired the report “Faking Beauty: Photoshopping Sends Unhealthy Message to America’s Youth, AMA Says,” Photoshop product management director Maria Yap wrote: “We at Adobe applaud the AMA for raising this issue so parents can be prepared to have open and honest dialogue with their children about body image and advertisers act responsibly.”
In its 20-plus years, Photoshop has gone from creating unreal worlds to unreal expectations. But Photoshop is a creative tool and with it comes great responsibility. Glamour’s Leive sums it up in the words of one interviewee: “Photoshop is like the Force. There’s a light side and a dark side.”

  • Anonymous says:

    I have always considered the selling of anorexic models to young girls to be repulsive. It has been around for years and now there are other ‘fixes’ coming along. Teeth are white but white comes in many shades. Now, everyone is expected to have chalk white teeth and they look totally fake. Even dentures are created with the natural ‘white’ of the person in mind.
    This goes right along with the ‘banana lips’ popping off so many women’s faces on television. Must everyone look like Angelina Jolie? Maybe it’s time we let our little girls be proud of themselves sans botox or the insipid looks of the wigged and tierraed toddlers.

  • Anonymous says:

    Why not just place a Disclaimer on the photo?
    “This Image has been digitally altered.”

  • Anonymous says:

    I couldn’t help but laugh at this article. I think it’s probably because I am an old lady who has used Photoshop for so many years that I have a hard time believing an unretouched photo of ANYTHING is actually unretouched (which could be great for getting you out of jury duty, by the way). Lol…and maybe because I wouldn’t at all mind being seriously Photoshopped beyond recognition…

    Do we really think that our youth is being sent unhealthy messages, that they are so unsophisticated as to believe the magazine photos are real? Makes you wonder how they are internalizing the heros and heroines in their video games, hmm?

  • Anonymous says:

    Photoshop is just a tool like a pen or pencil. It’s up to the users (or editors) to paint a true picture or label it fiction or fantasy. The industry as a whole (magazines, movie moguls, news reporters) all distort the truth and try to present something more (glam) than what it actually is (realistic). Don’t blame the pencil.

  • >
    Notice: We use cookies on our websites to give you a great online experience. If you keep browsing, we'll assume you're ok with this. For more information, see our privacy policy. By closing this banner, you agree to the use of cookies.I AGREENo