Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dwayne Harris
MemberHank–for the guy who was doing it, it was a thing of old dog, new tricks. I could have done it either way, though I must confess I totally prefer ID over Quark. And a lot of our clients want things moved over to InDesign. They're converting when they can and all new jobs are ID.
Dwayne Harris
MemberHank–for the guy who was doing it, it was a thing of old dog, new tricks. I could have done it either way, though I must confess I totally prefer ID over Quark. And a lot of our clients want things moved over to InDesign. They're converting when they can and all new jobs are ID.
Dwayne Harris
MemberGood luck with your naming style, Vincent.
And I want to add-we work with some publishers whose naming convention is even more abbreviated than what myself and others use. P for “paragraph,” or pl for “paragraph flush,” etc. It's for their XML tagging for when they archive the files or something. Now–names like that totally confuse me.
And, while I know my abbreviated style is not popular (though it's used by a lot of publishers), H1 for a level 1 head is easier to mark-up and remember, and to me makes sense. H2 for a level 2 head, etc.
But like I said–everyone has their own naming conventions and ways of doing things. And it depends on your work flow and clients.
doc
Dwayne Harris
MemberI hear 'ya Hank. A HUGE clickable area!

{EDIT: Just to check my post time versus edit time–they are off hours}
Dwayne Harris
MemberI totally agree, Bob.
I'll tell you what's even worse. When the job was done in InDesign and someone who wants to “collaborate” doesn't have InDesign, but wants the file in Quark!
{Doc walks away muttering “I will not rant, I will not rant, I will not rant”…}
Dwayne Harris
MemberI guess I'm lucky with abbreviated style sheet names. With the book publishers we work with, it's pretty standard. For example, many of the book publishers use:
CN – chapter number
CT – chapter title
PN – part number
PT – part title
FMH – frontmatter head
HT – half title
TX -text
TXF – text flush
EXT – extract
etc. etc.
To me it's great, and since I have to mark up the manuscript (and write the stylesheets), it's much easier to write “TX” in front of the paragraph than to write “body paragraph” or “body level” or something. And luckily this naming convention has been in place for years.
As an aside–we still mark up manuscript with quark tagging as we use XTags for Quark and ID.
doc
Dwayne Harris
MemberSo, it was my imagination, David :(
Anyway–yup–it's now the opposite. I always thought that the latest should be on top :)
Dwayne Harris
MemberI am now doing annual reports, as well. Someone else in the shop used to do them and it was done in Quark–and it would take him week.
I switched it over to InDesign CS4 this year, and cut the time in half by using ID’s table feature. I’m sure I can shave off more time when I tweak it more next year.
Dwayne Harris
MemberGood luck with your naming style, Vincent.
And I want to add-we work with some publishers whose naming convention is even more abbreviated than what myself and others use. P for “paragraph,” or pl for “paragraph flush,” etc. It's for their XML tagging for when they archive the files or something. Now–names like that totally confuse me.
And, while I know my abbreviated style is not popular (though it's used by a lot of publishers), H1 for a level 1 head is easier to mark-up and remember, and to me makes sense. H2 for a level 2 head, etc.
But like I said–everyone has their own naming conventions and ways of doing things. And it depends on your work flow and clients.
doc
Dwayne Harris
MemberI hear 'ya Hank. A HUGE clickable area!

{EDIT: Just to check my post time versus edit time–they are off hours}
Dwayne Harris
MemberI totally agree, Bob.
I'll tell you what's even worse. When the job was done in InDesign and someone who wants to “collaborate” doesn't have InDesign, but wants the file in Quark!
{Doc walks away muttering “I will not rant, I will not rant, I will not rant”…}
Dwayne Harris
MemberI guess I'm lucky with abbreviated style sheet names. With the book publishers we work with, it's pretty standard. For example, many of the book publishers use:
CN – chapter number
CT – chapter title
PN – part number
PT – part title
FMH – frontmatter head
HT – half title
TX -text
TXF – text flush
EXT – extract
etc. etc.
To me it's great, and since I have to mark up the manuscript (and write the stylesheets), it's much easier to write “TX” in front of the paragraph than to write “body paragraph” or “body level” or something. And luckily this naming convention has been in place for years.
As an aside–we still mark up manuscript with quark tagging as we use XTags for Quark and ID.
doc
Dwayne Harris
MemberSo, it was my imagination, David :(
Anyway–yup–it's now the opposite. I always thought that the latest should be on top :)
Dwayne Harris
MemberI am now doing annual reports, as well. Someone else in the shop used to do them and it was done in Quark–and it would take him week.
I switched it over to InDesign CS4 this year, and cut the time in half by using ID’s table feature. I’m sure I can shave off more time when I tweak it more next year.
Dwayne Harris
MemberI right click everthing. It's amaziing what you are presented with.
-
AuthorPosts
