Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2011 at 8:24 am in reply to: How to return to the selection tool from editing text? #59017
David BlatnerKeymasteresc should work on both mac and windows. Perhaps it's been mapped to something else? What about Ctrl-click, then press V.
David BlatnerKeymasterDoes this article help?
David BlatnerKeymasterPeople have asked for this kind of feature for many years, ever since the old QX days. I've never seen anyone do it. I believe it would require a plug-in developer and I think it's kind of tricky. However, I'll ask a couple of people I know.
David BlatnerKeymasterIf you're using the DPS system, you're probably part of the prerelease forums. Might be better to ask that there for now. However, I think the answer to both is: You need to make an HTML5 overlay.
David BlatnerKeymasterAre you turning left-pages to right-pages and vice versa? That has always been a challenge, as master page items get “reapplied.”
Using the layers panel can often help.
David BlatnerKeymasterI want to back up Mark G. in one thing: Yes, I do believe that in certain situations, on certain RIPs, and with certain images that have sharp edges, higher resolution does result in what he calls a combination tone. In fact, this came up in the very first edition of my book “Real World Scanning & Halftones.” Some images, when printed as halftones, do appear to be a combination of vector and halftone artwork. That is, there are printer dots where there shouldn't be (between halftone spots).
I actually showed this to Chuck Geschke (one of the inventors of PostScript) and, if I recall correctly, he thought it was likely a bug in the halftone algorithm. That said, it does turn out to be useful because it gives a better illusion of edge detail where the halftone would ordinarily have trouble with it.
So Mark isn't crazy! But I agree with everyone else (and my earlier comments) that increasing resolution as a general practice, or even when you have these kinds of images, is not the best technique. Reasons:
- If it's rasterized, you probably don't have control over what's going to happen downstream (how do you know it's not going to get downsampled by the rip, the software, a person, etc.)?
- It's just plain easier and more straightforward to save as PDF. True, your file may be rasterized by some moron downstream, but at least you can argue that it was vector and they screwed it up. If you provide pixels, you can't argue with them.
- The “bug” of “combination tone” is not guaranteed on all RIPs. Again, halftone output should not exhibit printer dots between the halftone spots, so the fact that you're getting them is a lucky accident.
- Your file sizes are way bigger than they need to be. I just made a document with only text and vector shapes in it; it was 7 MB at 300 ppi tiff; 58 MB as an uncompressed 900 ppi tiff; 3.2 MB as an LZW compressed 900 ppi tiff; but only 188 K as a PDF. (Or 510 K if I included the psd data to make it editable in the future, which the rasterized tiff would certainly not be.)
I hope that helps!
David BlatnerKeymasterI want to back up Mark G. in one thing: Yes, I do believe that in certain situations, on certain RIPs, and with certain images that have sharp edges, higher resolution does result in what he calls a combination tone. In fact, this came up in the very first edition of my book “Real World Scanning & Halftones.” Some images, when printed as halftones, do appear to be a combination of vector and halftone artwork. That is, there are printer dots where there shouldn't be (between halftone spots).
I actually showed this to Chuck Geschke (one of the inventors of PostScript) and, if I recall correctly, he thought it was likely a bug in the halftone algorithm. That said, it does turn out to be useful because it gives a better illusion of edge detail where the halftone would ordinarily have trouble with it.
So Mark isn't crazy! But I agree with everyone else (and my earlier comments) that increasing resolution as a general practice, or even when you have these kinds of images, is not the best technique. Reasons:
- If it's rasterized, you probably don't have control over what's going to happen downstream (how do you know it's not going to get downsampled by the rip, the software, a person, etc.)?
- It's just plain easier and more straightforward to save as PDF. True, your file may be rasterized by some moron downstream, but at least you can argue that it was vector and they screwed it up. If you provide pixels, you can't argue with them.
- The “bug” of “combination tone” is not guaranteed on all RIPs. Again, halftone output should not exhibit printer dots between the halftone spots, so the fact that you're getting them is a lucky accident.
- Your file sizes are way bigger than they need to be. I just made a document with only text and vector shapes in it; it was 7 MB at 300 ppi tiff; 58 MB as an uncompressed 900 ppi tiff; 3.2 MB as an LZW compressed 900 ppi tiff; but only 188 K as a PDF. (Or 510 K if I included the psd data to make it editable in the future, which the rasterized tiff would certainly not be.)
I hope that helps!
David BlatnerKeymaster@mchak: These are great ideas! I will talk with the developer about adding these.
March 8, 2011 at 8:23 pm in reply to: Possible to make guides w/o dragging from (or showing) ruler? [cs4] #58917
David BlatnerKeymasterThe Blatner Tools suite of plug-ins (https://blatnertools.com/) lets you assign a keyboard shortcut to “create horizontal guide here,” (or vertical) where “here” means wherever the cursor currently is. You can use the Keyboard Shortcuts panel (part of the Suite) to find it.
David BlatnerKeymasterNot stupid at all; it's not always easy to find the right feature. Does this link help?
David BlatnerKeymasterIf I recall, the gap space is based on the current page's Margins & Columns setting? You can control that with Layout > Margins & Columns.
David BlatnerKeymasterInDesign cannot export pdfs with form fields in them. We've all been asking for that for many years. You can make a form and then add the form fields in Acrobat Pro.
That said, you can make tables in InDesign that have spreadsheet functions in them with this plug-in: https://dtptools.com/product.asp?id=atid
David BlatnerKeymasterWe talked about some tech issues in our last podcast:
https://creativepro.com/ind…..st-144.php
one of these is a strange SING problem, which seems to affect some people and not others:
https://www.claudiamccue.com/20…..dont-sing/
and
February 28, 2011 at 9:54 am in reply to: Crop image data to frames sometimes isn't, and it gets stranger… #58822
David BlatnerKeymasterThat sounds very strange! Even more strange that when the checkbox is ON, the problem shows up. Seems backward, yes? Are you printing from Acrobat? Or some other PDF reader? Are you printing to a true postscript printer? Can you see the problem on screen in Acrobat Pro?
David BlatnerKeymasterThat is strange. I do not see any difference between copy/paste and moving pages between documents. In both cases, the target document style is used.
Does this happen with all documents? (Try new documents, too, as a test.) Maybe rebuild preferences?
-
AuthorPosts
