From the Archive
This article is from February 10, 2017, and is no longer current.
Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,251 through 5,265 (of 6,076 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How to return to the selection tool from editing text? #59017
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    esc should work on both mac and windows. Perhaps it's been mapped to something else? What about Ctrl-click, then press V.

    in reply to: Images and the Paste Into Command CS5 #58976
    David Blatner
    Keymaster
    in reply to: Password Protect InDesign File (CS4) #58963
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    People have asked for this kind of feature for many years, ever since the old QX days. I've never seen anyone do it. I believe it would require a plug-in developer and I think it's kind of tricky. However, I'll ask a couple of people I know.

    in reply to: Integrating Maps and video to an iPad magazine page #58961
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    If you're using the DPS system, you're probably part of the prerelease forums. Might be better to ask that there for now. However, I think the answer to both is: You need to make an HTML5 overlay.

    in reply to: Moving pages makes a mess – help #58958
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    Are you turning left-pages to right-pages and vice versa? That has always been a challenge, as master page items get “reapplied.”

    Using the layers panel can often help.

    in reply to: InDesign/Prepress Myths #58947
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    I want to back up Mark G. in one thing: Yes, I do believe that in certain situations, on certain RIPs, and with certain images that have sharp edges, higher resolution does result in what he calls a combination tone. In fact, this came up in the very first edition of my book “Real World Scanning & Halftones.” Some images, when printed as halftones, do appear to be a combination of vector and halftone artwork. That is, there are printer dots where there shouldn't be (between halftone spots).

    I actually showed this to Chuck Geschke (one of the inventors of PostScript) and, if I recall correctly, he thought it was likely a bug in the halftone algorithm. That said, it does turn out to be useful because it gives a better illusion of edge detail where the halftone would ordinarily have trouble with it.

    So Mark isn't crazy! But I agree with everyone else (and my earlier comments) that increasing resolution as a general practice, or even when you have these kinds of images, is not the best technique. Reasons:

    • If it's rasterized, you probably don't have control over what's going to happen downstream (how do you know it's not going to get downsampled by the rip, the software, a person, etc.)?
    • It's just plain easier and more straightforward to save as PDF. True, your file may be rasterized by some moron downstream, but at least you can argue that it was vector and they screwed it up. If you provide pixels, you can't argue with them.
    • The “bug” of “combination tone” is not guaranteed on all RIPs. Again, halftone output should not exhibit printer dots between the halftone spots, so the fact that you're getting them is a lucky accident.
    • Your file sizes are way bigger than they need to be. I just made a document with only text and vector shapes in it; it was 7 MB at 300 ppi tiff; 58 MB as an uncompressed 900 ppi tiff; 3.2 MB as an LZW compressed 900 ppi tiff; but only 188 K as a PDF. (Or 510 K if I included the psd data to make it editable in the future, which the rasterized tiff would certainly not be.)

    I hope that helps!

    in reply to: InDesign/Prepress Myths #50984
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    I want to back up Mark G. in one thing: Yes, I do believe that in certain situations, on certain RIPs, and with certain images that have sharp edges, higher resolution does result in what he calls a combination tone. In fact, this came up in the very first edition of my book “Real World Scanning & Halftones.” Some images, when printed as halftones, do appear to be a combination of vector and halftone artwork. That is, there are printer dots where there shouldn't be (between halftone spots).

    I actually showed this to Chuck Geschke (one of the inventors of PostScript) and, if I recall correctly, he thought it was likely a bug in the halftone algorithm. That said, it does turn out to be useful because it gives a better illusion of edge detail where the halftone would ordinarily have trouble with it.

    So Mark isn't crazy! But I agree with everyone else (and my earlier comments) that increasing resolution as a general practice, or even when you have these kinds of images, is not the best technique. Reasons:

    • If it's rasterized, you probably don't have control over what's going to happen downstream (how do you know it's not going to get downsampled by the rip, the software, a person, etc.)?
    • It's just plain easier and more straightforward to save as PDF. True, your file may be rasterized by some moron downstream, but at least you can argue that it was vector and they screwed it up. If you provide pixels, you can't argue with them.
    • The “bug” of “combination tone” is not guaranteed on all RIPs. Again, halftone output should not exhibit printer dots between the halftone spots, so the fact that you're getting them is a lucky accident.
    • Your file sizes are way bigger than they need to be. I just made a document with only text and vector shapes in it; it was 7 MB at 300 ppi tiff; 58 MB as an uncompressed 900 ppi tiff; 3.2 MB as an LZW compressed 900 ppi tiff; but only 188 K as a PDF. (Or 510 K if I included the psd data to make it editable in the future, which the rasterized tiff would certainly not be.)

    I hope that helps!

    in reply to: Custom Quality Assurance error list (in Blatner Tools) #58926
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    @mchak: These are great ideas! I will talk with the developer about adding these.

    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    The Blatner Tools suite of plug-ins (https://blatnertools.com/) lets you assign a keyboard shortcut to “create horizontal guide here,” (or vertical) where “here” means wherever the cursor currently is. You can use the Keyboard Shortcuts panel (part of the Suite) to find it.

    in reply to: binding #58897
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    Not stupid at all; it's not always easy to find the right feature. Does this link help?

    https://creativepro.com/cre…..preads.php

    in reply to: Marquee Tool question #58852
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    If I recall, the gap space is based on the current page's Margins & Columns setting? You can control that with Layout > Margins & Columns.

    in reply to: Indesign equivalent of an Excel document #58829
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    InDesign cannot export pdfs with form fields in them. We've all been asking for that for many years. You can make a form and then add the form fields in Acrobat Pro.

    That said, you can make tables in InDesign that have spreadsheet functions in them with this plug-in: https://dtptools.com/product.asp?id=atid

    in reply to: InDesign CS5 crashing on save #58824
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    We talked about some tech issues in our last podcast:

    https://creativepro.com/ind…..st-144.php

    one of these is a strange SING problem, which seems to affect some people and not others:

    https://www.claudiamccue.com/20…..dont-sing/

    and

    https://kb2.adobe.com/cps/408/k…..08816.html

    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    That sounds very strange! Even more strange that when the checkbox is ON, the problem shows up. Seems backward, yes? Are you printing from Acrobat? Or some other PDF reader? Are you printing to a true postscript printer? Can you see the problem on screen in Acrobat Pro?

    in reply to: Parameters of ID styles needed #58821
    David Blatner
    Keymaster

    That is strange. I do not see any difference between copy/paste and moving pages between documents. In both cases, the target document style is used.

    Does this happen with all documents? (Try new documents, too, as a test.) Maybe rebuild preferences?

Viewing 15 posts - 5,251 through 5,265 (of 6,076 total)