Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 46 through 60 (of 172 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Relink same image place in multiple INDDs #74350
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    You have a single image file that is linked to multiple documents. The most straightforward way to accomplish relinking it would be to move the old logo to some other location, then copy the new logo file into the old location and rename it so it has the same name as the old one.

    Open all the book documents and click “update links” as each one opens. Not much you can do about that part.

    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    It should be possible to create a numbered list that continues across frames for your Section+Page numbering, using the Section marker as a prefix. The text frame would have to contain a white space character, so as to activate the number for that frame. This could work with just one master page if you split each section out into its own document and collected them using the Book panel. Alternatively, you could restart the numbering on the first such frame of each new section.

    Your regular folios could then simply be “Current page number” without prefix.

    in reply to: Removing/adding page without disturbing design #74348
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Paul, at this point I’d be casting around for an excuse *not* to delete that leftover laevo. For example, if there is any logical break in the sequence of topics, or any other reasonable pretext, I would put some kind of graphic or marker on the otherwise-blank page. (It is standard practice for a new chapter to begin on a right hand page (recto), even if the facing page is blank, so this isn’t such an outrageous idea.)

    Assuming that’s not possible:

    InDesign assigns the corresponding master pages to the left (laevo) and right (recto) pages of each spread. It applies the master to the *page*, not to the *content*. When you remove a single page, then, every subsequent page is now on the opposite side. What was a recto has become a laevo, and vice versa. That’s the way InDesign works.

    The first workaround that occurs to me is to set up a second master spread as a mirror image of the original, so that what currently is on the left page goes to the right and what was on the right goes to the left. That’s the kind of thing you can do in a layout that would never work in politics. But I digress.

    In the pages panel, select all the problem pages (click on the first one, shift-click on the last one). Apply the new master to them in one shot by picking “Apply Master to Pages…” from the Pages panel flyout menu and choosing your mirror-image master spread.

    For the future, you can avoid running head issues like the one you describe. Extend the author name text frames the full width of their respective pages. In the paragraph style for the author name, go to the Indents and Spacing section and select “Toward Spine” or “Away from Spine” from the Alignment dropdown, depending on where you want them to appear. You can do the same with page numbers and other items that must be placed toward or away from the spine. In your particular scenario, you’d have two text frames, one directly above the other: one for the page number and one for the author name.

    in reply to: Applying object style to text copy-pasted into template #74347
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Rather than applying the object style and then pasting the text, you could start with a simple text frame and then apply the object style.

    To make this easy for your non-savvy client, assign a keyboard shortcut to the object style and tell the client “Paste the content, press Escape then [keyboard shortcut].”

    That should be easy to memorize and easy for the client to build into muscle memory so it becomes second nature.

    in reply to: Newbie disappearing text box frustration #72354
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    From the sound of things, you have another object on that left page, which could be an image or another text frame (and possibly on a different layer), with Word Wrap turned on. This object is probably on the master page, based on your description.

    Try right-clicking on the text frame, choosing Text Frame Options, and checking “Ignore Text Wrap.” You text should automagically appear. If that’s the case, remove whatever object is causing the problem or change its text-wrap setting to “off”.

    in reply to: Snap to margin/guides #72116
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Snapping to margins and column guides is enabled by default, and if you have “Snap to Guides” turned on it should be working fine. If this occurring in only one document, you can probably clear the problem by saving it out as idml and creating a fresh indd from the saved idml file. If it’s a problem with all documents, it may be time to trash your InDesign preferences by holding down all your meta keys (Ctl, Alt and Shift on Windows; Ctl, Opt, Cmd, Shift on Mac) while InDesign is starting.

    in reply to: See Pixel sizes at 100% #71813
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    There are two related-but-different design issues here. One is the run-of-the-mill issue of sizing things correctly, the other is the one Salieri is concerned with: “designing for tiny” is different from “designing for big.”

    There are plenty of print situations where this is a big consideration. A logo design is often drawn twice, one version for “normal” size reproduction and another for small applications such as business cards or tchotchkes.** The small version often uses less detail and/or heavier strokes so as not to appear weak at its intended print size. When I was ordering pens for my own promotional purposes (the one I gave you at the conference!), I had to redraw the logo so it would “read” properly at that tiny size.

    When it comes to something like a web ad, as a designer you have to make it so it grabs attention — tricky enough in its own right — and maintains legible detail and looks good. You can’t assess that accurately without viewing it at the size it will actually be when it’s displayed on <random website>, so I can see why it’s a problem. On the other hand, screen resolutions are so variable now that looking at your design on only one device might be misleading in itself. My phone has a Quad-HD resolution, 1.5 times that of my main workstation monitor. The monitor is 30 inches @ 2560×1600, the phone is 5.7 inches @ 3840×2160, my laptop is 17.3 inches @ 1920×1080. The same image viewed in a browser on each device is radically different in size.

    That’s why I suggested that the fact InDesign’s “100 Percent” view isn’t pixel-for-pixel accurate is not necessarily something to agonize over.

    —————-

    ** For readers unfamiliar with the wonderfully expressive vocabulary handed down to us by Yiddish-speaking immigrants to America, a “tchotchke” is a small item such as an ornament, usually more decorative than functional. The small promotional items companies hand out are often referred to as tchotchkes. (Microsoft’s giveaway of a Surface Pro 3 to attendees at Adobe MAX this year would not fall into this category, Mac aficionados notwithstanding. but the Adobe Creative Cloud pens would.)

    in reply to: See Pixel sizes at 100% #71783
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    I recommend the InDesign workflow to everyone doing this kind of creative. The speed with which you can create an accurate layout in ID (not to mention ID’s type engine) is jaw-dropping to someone who’s only used Photoshop. Several of my friends have the maxillary bruises to prove it.

    Under the hood, in the dark recesses of your system where only low-level functions hang out, some minion of the OS is telling InDesign that the resolution of your monitor is [x] pixels/inch (a number that may or may not be accurate).

    InDesign has with this manic fixation that if you set your document dimensions in px you really meant points. So InDesign goes through the marvelously convoluted calculation of converting your document dimensions in pixels to a size in inches, then converting that (using the pixels/inch value passed to it by the OS) to a new pixel count. If the px/in value from the OS is valid, and you’re planning to print your document, the 100% view works reasonably well. If you’re targeting the web, it doesn’t.

    You could work around this by telling your OS the blatant lie that your main display is 72 ppi. (Pray that it never finds out, because it will probably sue for divorce.) Other things in your system use that value that you probably don’t want to alter, but if churning out MPUs is what you spend most of your time doing, it’s certainly worth a try. In fact, if the px/in value being reported to your OS is flagrantly wrong now, you may get a far better result in general.

    A compromise might be to zoom out one click from “100%”. It may not be exactly the size you see in Photoshop, but it may give you a better look at it.

    Having said all that, the actual visual dimensions of your MPU are going to be so different on each of the many screen sizes out there (especially mobile devices) that I wouldn’t consider it worth the effort to try for some exact value. You might want to give yourself a week to get used to ID’s concept of 100% before you decide you really need to change it. InDesign’s way of doing it isn’t necessarily wrong unless you’re targeting an exact, known display; it’s just different. Because I use this workflow for everything from web banners to outdoor electronic billboards, I’ve never paid much attention to exact size. An electronic billboard display can be 60 feet wide. The artwork is 1400 pixels (no kidding!), so a “100% view” is pretty meaningless.

    It’s probably more worthwhile to get several displays of different resolutions hooked up. What looks about right on your 110 ppi professional screen might look positively clunky on a generic 1280×1024 screen but wimpy on a high-res smartphone.

Viewing 8 posts - 46 through 60 (of 172 total)