I don't use EPS anymore – not since switching from Quark back in 2005.
Here's an interesting article and an interesting quote at the bottom from Dov Issacs (of adobe I believe) https://www.prepressure.com/lib…..ormats/eps
Anyway – I am getting files sent in EPS format from Photoshop and I really don't know what to say to the supplier. I don't have any hard reasoning other than I know it's not the best but I can't formulate my hatred for EPS into logical reasons for not using it.
InDesign, in my opinion is best with either PSD, TIFF or PDF from Photoshop.
Reasoning is that an EPS can't retain layers, it's completely flattened when re-opened in photoshop. Therefore, any vector goodness, like shapes, text or masks, would be rasterised. Where the EPS where you've used vectors like text, masks and shapes, will export fine from the initial export to EPS and it also outputs the vectors. It's handy – but there are more reasons for not using EPS files, and I can't formulate the explanation into any sort of reasonable argument.
Surely though, PSD or TIFF where you have just raster and/or layers, where the PSD and TIFF will always output as raster regardless whether you've preserved text layers, vector shapes/masks.
Then by sound reasoning a PDF from photohsop would be far better as that can output the vectors, retain the layers and also maintain the raster elements. And it's fully editable if you select the “maintain photoshop capabilities”. Which is tré handy.
As for Illustrator files, I just prefer the AI format. I don't know why I just don't don't like the EPS. I used to know why – but I've forgotten why? And now when someone asks me I can't explain it. But – I maintain an AI or PDF from Illustrator is better.