Recently I designed a 44-pp A4 black and white conference handbook in InDesign CS6 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) using Opentype fonts Warnock Pro and Satero Sans LT Pro. The InDesign file looked great; the print-ready pdf looked great; but when the job was digitally printed (by a reliable, high quality print supplier) the Satero Sans font had frequently and apparently randomly toggled between Bold and Italic in the kind of way I used to experience occasionally a decade or more ago where fonts were not properly embedded with Acrobat files. This was despite my endeavours to use best practice by consistent use of Paragraph and Character styling throughout the document.
My fault for not getting a printer’s proof, I know (fast turnaround pressure was part of the problem, but no excuse). But my question is: what happened? And how can I trust it won’t happen again?
In case font management was the problem, we have tested the InDesign and pdf files on other production Macs — laser printouts behave similarly, even though we have explicitly checked that the relevant fonts are installed and accessible for use. We have examined Satero Sans LT Pro, Satero Sans LT Pro Bold and Satero Sans LT Pro Italic (the weights of Satero Sans used for this job) with Font Doctor: no indication of anything amiss.
I like Satero Sans, but I’m now skittish about using it (it’s the first time I’ve used it for a major print job). Should I go back to the font supplier from whom I purchased Satero Sans — Linotype? Or is it more likely to be a font management issue within InDesign? Is there analysis I can apply to the InDesign file to ascertain what went on? What would the veterans of InDesignSecrets recommend I do in order to restore my confidence in using Satero Sans (or at worst, get my money back if it’s fatally flawed)?
If anyone has the time or inclination to look further into this, a sample three pages of the flawed publication in pdf format can be accessed here: https://www.hightail.com/download/bWJwM25MTERUME5sQXNUQw