Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Point size changes #14323928
    Tim Murray
    Member

    How do you do the italic? A style? Keystroke? If it’s a style, the style might be defined as 10 when that setting should be blank.

    in reply to: Second line of paragraph "jumps" to create unwanted gap #14323982
    Tim Murray
    Member

    I don’t mean “space” as in the Space Bar, I mean Paragraph Style Options > Indents and Spacing panel > Space Before (or After) fields.

    in reply to: Second line of paragraph "jumps" to create unwanted gap #14323984
    Tim Murray
    Member

    What is your reason for the added leading to one word? When I did it (from 14 to 18), InDesign just moved the whole paragraph down four points. Why not just use a space before or space after?

    Tim Murray
    Member

    I have to say this: Have you considered rewriting content and footnotes? I view footnotes as “by-the-way” to give info on where content is found and who did it, or to explain something a bit. If your footnote is that long, it seems to me such content deserves to be in the body.

    in reply to: Auto size is not working as expected #14324359
    Tim Murray
    Member

    Unless the frame has visible (meaning in print) edge for a design reason, I don’t see why it’s not simply wide enough to accommodate the 100s or heck, more.

    in reply to: Creating PDFs for Acrobat AND BlueBeam?? #116060
    Tim Murray
    Member

    Have you tried adding one of the standards to your PDF or Distiller settings?

    in reply to: Old Corrupted InD files – any solution? #114961
    Tim Murray
    Member

    They might not be InDesign files. Slap some other extensions on them . . . you won’t hurt anything. You might even be able to break into them with a text editor or a hex editor and get some clues.

    in reply to: Interactive picture slidershow in PDF #114706
    Tim Murray
    Member

    Deleted

    in reply to: Fonts Open Type, True Type and Type 1 #114405
    Tim Murray
    Member

    Colleen, the phrase “Fonts are software and simply won’t work on newer systems” isn’t accurate.

    Back in the day, Type 1 and TrueType fonts were *made” for Mac or *made* for Windows. The problem is that Mac files (most often fonts and applications) used to have a resource fork and a data fork, and [unless the disk was set up to accommodate] a Windows device would kill one of the forks (I forget which). When you looked at it later you saw 0 bytes.

    The fork thing was a bane to a very large customer. They stored many gigs of Mac fonts and apps on a Novell server that was not configured to house Mac files, and trashed them. I warned them, but nooooo….

    But basically, you can use even back to 1982 bitmapped fonts and T1 fonts on a machine shipped last week. (Umm, not sure about Multiple Master. But I never met anyone who used them.) You just don’t want to push old Mac faces onto a Windows platform. You can store old Windows-made fonts on a Mac, but that’s only store; you can’t use them in apps.

    You also need to be careful of a font with TTF extension. Generally, but not always, an old Mac font did not ship with an extension at all, but if an extension were to be added, just looking at the file name won’t tell you if it is a Mac-rename or a Windows-native file.

    That said, it’s still a good idea to move to OTF.

    in reply to: Fonts Open Type, True Type and Type 1 #114383
    Tim Murray
    Member

    There are OTFs “based on” Type 1 and OTFs “based on” TrueHype. The file structure of OTFs don’t have what are called “forks”, and so Windows won’t break them. I said go with the Type 1-based OTFs because I simply don’t like TrueHype — thus the name change! — for some technical reasons, even when they have been turned into OTF.

    in reply to: Fonts Open Type, True Type and Type 1 #114380
    Tim Murray
    Member

    “Also, the fonts in the documents fonts folder, are 0kb. From what I understand, Mac didn’t allow for some reason to save these fonts in the package.”

    I would bet dollars to donuts the package was saved on a Windows server. Windows does not allow for the resource fork (or maybe it’s the data fork) of a Type 1 font, and turns it to zero. But in any case, type 1-based OTF is the way to go. Not TrueHype.

    in reply to: Packaging Multi InDesign Files #114374
    Tim Murray
    Member

    I’m hesitant to believe it occurs only upon downloading the next day. If you check after the upload to the server, are the numbered extras there? Hours later? Next morning, *before* the download to your Mac?

    in reply to: Packaging Multi InDesign Files #114240
    Tim Murray
    Member

    You said “…upon downloading the File on the next day…” do you mean you find the numbered files on your computer but NOT the server? Also, what is your platform?

    Tim Murray
    Member

    I have a tendency to rant about old software, but CS3? That was released in 2007. But I can think of a couple of things:
    • Reduce Distiller’s resolution, where ever you find it. This (misnamed) setting affects only the object placement granularity on the page, not the actual resolution of the objects. 
    • Turn off “optimize for fast web view”
    • Use one of the compliance standards
    • Update used typefaces (this is one I personally found, many years ago. The problem occurred with TrueHype faces where using some might knock out graphic elements. Change the face and the graphic would come back. I swear.)

    in reply to: Massive png files inside a linked Word file #114213
    Tim Murray
    Member

    It would seem one solution is the same thing: Replace the PNGs in Word with TIFFs, but with thousands of files I have to admit that I have not used InData and if the developer doesn’t know the fix for Word, maybe you’ll have to use Google Docs. Sorry I can’t help further.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)