Have an account? Sign in
"*" indicates required fields
You agree that CreativePro Network may send you emails, including the newsletter selections above. You can unsubscribe at any time.
By signing in, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge our Privacy Notice.
New user? Create an account
By signing in, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge our Privacy Notice.
Allright, I found the solution after a night of sleep. Here’s what I did:
I stopped the character style conversion at the comma prior to the new opening bracket:
(?<=\]).*?(?=(,\[))
Sure thing, I understand the confusion. What I want is to use Crossreferencing, by just referencing the paragraph number.
Now, seeing only numbers in the cross-reference panel is very confusing to me, so I stumbled upon a “hack” where you can use the entire paragraph’s text, but reduce the visibility of anything but the numbers with a really small character style and GREP.
My goal is to have a sources list with fully formatted text in APA style. My referencing in-text should look like a superscript number at the end of a piece of text. These could be multiple numbers in case it was made by combining multiple sources. Basically, all the formatting has been taken care of, except for that I want to be able to see the comma I place between the cross references.
My entire cross-reference would be the full size reference, which I denote between the quotation marks. In this case, I have two sources for one piece of text, so two separate cross-references between quotation:
“[1] Author, A. (2000). Title.”, “[2] Author, A. (2000). Title.”
I put a comma in between the two to seperate the cross-references. Now if my really small character style wouldn’t affect the commas I would have my desired result (just the numbers and comma):
“1, 2”
What I did to achieve this, is remove any text in between the closing and opening bracked ]….this text….[
With this: (?<=\]).*?(?=\[) and the character style set to the really small text.
So my question is can I exclude my comma from being overridden with the really small characters?
The logic could be as follows: override all text between ] AND [ except for the seperating comma. I am thinking about using a lookahead that searches for “,\[” which is “, [” so any comma prior to the start of a new reference. Can that be incorporated into the previous GREP piece to exclude that specific string of characters from receiving the really small character style override?
This site uses cookies, but not the kind you eat. We use cookies to remember log in details, provide secure log in, improve site functionality, and deliver personalized content. By continuing to browse the site, you accept cookies.