Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 179 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Piracy good or bad #59331
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    @Jeremy: It's true that home taping didn't kill music, but pirate downloading has crashed the income of many recording artists. I have friends in the music business, touring musicians with well-known artists, who have had to take fairly deep salary cuts and loss of other benefits over the years because the artist's royalties from recording sales plummetted with the original Napster, and have only gone down since then. This isn't because the artists in question aren't popular (they still sell out concerts across the world), it's because for every album they sell, four or five copies are downloaded “free” or are “shared.” Nobody can take an 80% loss of income and carry on as if nothing's changed.

    Perhaps because I have this kind of direct, personal experience, I don't think of piracy in terms of “big companies.” I think of it in terms of people who can't be employed by those companies, or who end up losing their jobs, whose families depend on that income. Less income from sales translates straight through to fewer employees and/or fewer employee benefits, not least because salaries are by far the single biggest expense on a company's books.

    In much the same way, as Theun pointed out, too many people with bootleg software undercutting legitimate businesses translates into missing job openings for designers, or depressed salaries, or both. This is especially true in small businesses, where business owners quite often pay themselves less than minimum wage.

    Piracy issues are easy enough to justify when they're cast in philosophic, abstract terms. But there are always real people involved, and real consequences.

    in reply to: Image degradation on resaving from PSD to JPEG #59329
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    I'm with Deke McClelland on the subject of downsampling: bicubic sharper is best avoided because it almost always oversharpens, especially when you're making big resolution changes. Regular bicubic gives a far better result >95% of the time, and you can then tweak the sharpening with Unsharp Mask or Smart Sharpen as needed.

    The answer to your question is, “It depends.” Sharpening is one of those esoteric subjects that is highly dependent on the final output device, not simply the final resolution. What works beautifully for a good quality photo printer won't be optimum for 150-line screen on an offset press, nor for viewing on a monitor. Deke has several excellent books, several Lynda.com titles and various tutorials on deke.com that go into this in depth.

    If you're designing for high-end magazine or book publishing, you are always going to be better off treating each image individually and carefully in Photoshop. I would recommend a plug-in such as the excellent Nik sharpener, which fine tunes for specific types of final output. The rest of the time you can let InDesign's PDF export do its stuff (it's the exact same engine as Photoshop, because the actual Photoshop code was baked into InDesign long since) and get great results with far less time spent agonizing over details.

    in reply to: Moving or Migrating InDesign CS5 Presets to new Mac #59328
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Anne-Marie said:

    Try it and let us know if your computer explodes.


    Um… I tried doing that on one of my computers, and got a strange “System Meltdown” message, just before the magic smoke* leaked out of the hard drive. :-D

    * Magic smoke is what makes all electronic devices work. This is proven by the fact that when it leaks out, the device stops working.

    in reply to: Tethering an Android 2.1 with an iPad2 #59327
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Jongware said:Uh. On which of these machines are you planning to run InDesign?


    LOL! I believe there was a detailed post about that on InDesign Secrets just a few weeks ago… :-D

    in reply to: Can't get page numbering to start at 1 on actual page 7 #59326
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    lshiffri said:I have been searching and reading everything out there but can't make this work. I need page 1 to be on physical page 7. I tried a new master but it shows “page 7” and I cannot figure out how to tell it to start at page 1. If I use special characters>markers the page number is not displayed anywhere. I have not found exact steps anywhere on how this should be done. It doesn't seem like this should be so difficult. Help, please.


    Shone's got it right. The situation you describe is the standard one for a book layout. The first physical pages, containing the half-title, title, copyright, TOC, preface and sometimes other bits are collectively called “Front Matter.” They are almost always given lowercase roman numerals (whether they are shown, as on the TOC, Preface, etc., or not, as on the title and half-title pages). In the Numbering and Section options for that section, you would choose lowercase roman numerals. The seventh page is the actual beginning of the book, so it is the start of a new section, and its Numbering and Section Options should be set to start numbering at page 1 and to use regular Arabic numerals.

    in reply to: Global Changes to Multiple Instruction Booklets #59325
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    @chadteter:

    You can place an INDD as a graphic, and like any placed file it will update via the links panel. That takes care of pages or sections that are common to all the manuals in a set. There are other InDesign features you can use that will speed things up even more.

    Here's one possible workflow. First you need to set up the documents for each of your product lines. As with any production line, a bit of preparation up front can save you many hours of work down the road:

    1. Create individual INDD documents for each of the common pages or sets of pages within the booklets, and replace the current static text with your newly-created subsection(s).
    2. Create a new InDesign book (File>New>Book), and in the book panel flyout menu, under Page Numbering Options and UNCHECK “Automatically Update Page Numbers”. Leave the other defaults.
    3. Add all the booklets for a product line to that book.
    4. Just to be really safe against future accidents, select each document in turn in the book panel and change the Docuemnt Numbering Options to start page numbering at 1.
    5. Save the book and the documents.

    Weeks go by, and now you have some changes to make. Modify the common pages that are in the separate .indd you created in step 1, then open the .indb book file from step 2.

    Open all the booklets at once by selecting all in the book panel and double-clicking on any one of them.

    Now that you have all the booklets open, you can update the links by selecting “Update All Links” from the links panel flyout menu in each document. Assign a keyboard shortcut to it, for greater speed, or for warp speed use a simple script that cycles through the open documents and does this (make sure the dilithium crystals aren't cracked, Scotty).

    Anything that needs a Find/Change (such as part numbers) can be done for all documents at once by choosing “All Documents” in the Find/Change dialog. (Depending on how the changes go in a particular cycle, you might be able to do ALL of the edits using Find/Change.)

    If you've been using individual copy/paste up to now, the above should save you a day or so per set of changes, reduce the chance of carpal tunnel syndrome, improve your digestion and speed up the Earth's rotation by a nanosecond or two.

    An added benefit of the Book Panel approach is that if you ever need to modify the paragraph or character styles in the booklets (management decides that all headings in all corporate communications should be in Comic Sans, let's say, and you need the job too much to resign in protest) you can change the styles in one document, then use the Synchronize function in the book panel to update all the rest automatically. (You do have paragraph for everything, and character styles wherever needed, right? — Thought so.)

    Monday's come and gone by now, but I hope this helps for the future!

    in reply to: Image degradation on resaving from PSD to JPEG #59313
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    It's worth noting that unless you explicitly set something else in PDF export, your images will be jpeg-compressed on export and will be downsampled if more than 1.5x your target resolution, which at the default 300 ppi for print means that any image over 450 ppi at the size it is scaled to in the layout (the “effective resolution” in InDesign terms) will be downsampled. It's just part of how PDF export works.

    There are two schools of thought on this. One school says you should exactly size each image in Photoshop and place the resized copy in the layout. The other, more production-oriented view says place each one as a PSD and let the export-to-PDF function handle the downsampling, which in my experience works perfectly well for all but very high-end, critical print work. In either case, use the jpeg compression setting that works with your production needs, or turn off compression completely, in the PDF export dialog.

    Placing a PSD is much more productive (“Edit Original” allows round-tripping to Photoshop for any needed tweaks) than first making a jpeg or flattened tiff and placing that in the layout. It can save many hours in the course of a week. Quality degradation with jpeg is far less of an issue than most people believe, but in any case is avoided by keeping the image in a lossless format such as PSD.

    in reply to: Weird behavior viewing fresh PDF in Acrobat #59258
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    That's beyond weird. I can't imagine what would make that occur, far less why it would affect one flavor of PDF and not the other. I would be tempted to write it off as a quirk and ignore it otherwise, rather than (say) uninstalling and reinstalling Acrobat. In my experience with minor oddities like this, they go away as mysteriously as they show up, leaving a light patina of perplexity on the bottom of the screen. :-)

    in reply to: . Pages, Point pages, Sub Pages – help needed #59257
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    There's no way to do this with the automatic page numbering built into InDesign, but there is a way to at least reduce the pain.

    1. At the page immediately after the one where you're going to insert the “point pages” use the Section and Numbering options to create a new section. Turn off automatic numbering and type in the current page number as a value for the starting page.
    2. Insert your new pages, but override the automatic page number on each new page and replace the automatic value with the explicit “point page” number (7000.1, 700.2, etc.)

    Unless you have dozens of these per issue, it shouldn't become too unwieldy. I assume that the client “resets” the book every so often, so you get a fresh document every so often without (or fully incorporating) the inserted matter that lets you begin the cycle again.

    in reply to: calibration #59256
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Definitely ask each printer for their .joboptions file appropriate to the type of work you will submit. Colour is a roll of the dice unless you at least use the settings that the prepress department prefers for their particular software and press setup. Colour management via a Spyder or similar isn't worth a thing if your output file isn't right for that printer.

    General rule: Always, always, always consult the printer about any job before you submit final art. Your print providers and your clients will thank you, and you'll sleep better at night.

    in reply to: Color shift when printing to Epson 3880 #59255
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Check that your document color profile was set to ProPhoto before you placed the image, and that your colour management policies for RGB are to Preserve Embedded Profiles. If you place the image in a document with a default RGB profile and set (as different from convert to) a different color profile, or if your colour management settings convert incoming color profiles if they're different from the default, you would then have an extra profile conversion being applied that would definitely mess with the output.

    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    RGB black converts to a >300% rich black no matter how you handle it. If it's a problem, a quick fix is to bring the image into Photoshop and raise the black output “floor” to 5 using Levels. That brings the RGB 0,0,0 to CMYK conversion below 300% ink coverage while maintaining good contrast.

    An Adobe RGB or ProPhoto image is very often outside the gamut of CMYK process colors, so you may want to do other tweaks for best quality in any individual project. It's a good idea to confer with your printer's (or magazine publisher's) prepress department to find out what they prefer, and to get a contract proof before committing to press. A publication often has a .joboptions file (Distiller preset) that you can simply drop into your Acrobat settings folder, which pretty much eliminates the worries.

    in reply to: Wrong file name when exporting to pdf #59253
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Hi Maggs… Once you (or someone) has changed the name in an export dialog to something other than the document name, it's “sticky,” as you've noticed. To get back to the default, change the export name to the same name as the document, then save and close. Save As will thereafter default to the new document name in the export dialog.

    in reply to: Help with landscape layout #59251
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    And use a pencil, so you can change stuff easily! :-)

    in reply to: Paragraph Style Problems? Please help! #59250
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    I'd take a wild guess that CS4 was installed using the US English setting, and CS3 with International English setting. I don't have multiplie suite copies with the different settings to test this out, but I could see ID forcing the change when the copy is imported from an International English install to a US English install. If I recall correctly, there were odd issues with International English versions during the prerelease testing of CS4 products (fixed prior to launch, I'm pretty sure), so there are obviously some obscure-but-significant internal differences depending on which option you choose during the installation.

    The simplest workaround is probably to just go ahead and bring in everything you're going to be working with, then do a global Find/Change targeting that specific formatting setting. Save the query for reuse as needed, since you'll likely be wanting it again, by the sound of things.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 179 total)