Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 179 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Importing Print Presets brings only name no settings #71548
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Unlike PDF Presets, Print Presets are not synched via the cloud. It’s still a Save and Load proposition, although as far as I can tell it’s the only presets group that’s not been included yet. This kind of “set it up all over again” issue is why I spent so much time in 2011 lobbying for seamless migration. The point was made, and the team put a great deal of effort into it, but they’re not all the way there yet.

    If parameters from a saved preset aren’t being loaded (or perhaps not saved in the first place), that’s a major bug. My guess is that it’s something that’s not been on the radar because nobody’s been shouting about it in the forums or on the feature request/bug report form at Adobe.com. The InDesign product managers do read every bug report and feature request that’s posted using that form, so it’s worth taking the time to report it.

    in reply to: Changing page number /newbie #62331
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Unofrtunately, you're trying to swim upstream with this. Here's the deal: odd numbered pages are always on the right (recto), even numbered pages on the left (verso). This is a convention as old as printing and as fixed as “the cover of a book goes on the outside,” so violate it only if you absolutely must.

    You can tell InDesign to start numbering at 1 on any page, but that page, if it wasn't already a recto, will suddenly become one. Under normal circumstances, you can make the 3rd page, or the 501st page “page 1”, but not the 4th or the 44th without changing the spreads.

    So, all that said, if you must make your numbering start on a left hand page, go to the Pages Panel flyout menu and uncheck “Allow Document Pages to Shuffle.” Then right-click on the page, choose “Section and Page Numbering Options,” click the “Start at Page” radio button, and put 1 in the number field.

    in reply to: Two page spread, sort of! #62330
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    If your full-spread patterns are to be removable (and usable!) each one must be on one side of a full double page. They won't end up that way if you lay them out in one INDD and send a regular PDF to the printer to saddle-stitch. So yes, you should make two files, one for the instructions and the other for the templates.

    Coordinate with the printer about manufacture. Your templates would need to be collated with the instruction booklet, folded and, if you absolutely must, stapled into the center of the booklet so that they can be extracted in a usable form.

    in reply to: Page numbering – Best practices? #62328
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Interesting. I've not seen or designed a fiction work that doesn't follow Chicago. Other than the occasional publication that puts an introduction on page 1 (some anthologies of short stories do that), I don't recall a book that began content numbering in the front matter. Specific publishers may have a house style that requires that, of course, but you'd know that from their style guide before starting the project.

    in reply to: Splitting a gradient across a spread CS5.5 #62327
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    If you export these pages to PDF, the individual PDF pages will each have their own half of the gradient. If there's an absolute need to split the graphic, then do that and replace the double truck graphic with the appropriate PDF on each page.

    Normally, in a situation like this I simply send the PDF of the whole publication to the printer, which avoids any necessity to split a graphic that happens to cross a spread. (The same consideration applies to photographs or any graphic that runs across a spread.)

    in reply to: Separations Preview — blacker than black? #62326
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    It was a delight to see you again, and to meet Anne-Marie for the first time. I had no idea she was so petite! To borrow from Jackie Gleason's great line in “Smokey and the Bandit” — She sounds taller on the podcast. :)

    PePcon was, hands-down, the best, most enjoyable, most productive design-related conference I've ever been to. (You can quote me on that!) Three hours of unexpected “quality time” with Chris Kitchener and Doug Waterfall added a massive cherry on top of what was already a perfect pêche flambée avec crème frappé (oo la la!).

    But I digress…

    Yes, it's just weird that ID would do that, since it makes no sense whatsoever. And that it should change just because “Show Single Plates in Black” is unchecked just enhances the Twilight Zone ambiance. If this were an M. Knight Shayalaman movie, it would be an obscure clue to some supernatural force hidden in the program, eventually revealing that the reason the city streets chaotically change color every few hours is they are in the power of the Swatches panel. But I digress again. Coffee deficiency, don't y'know.

    in reply to: Separations Preview — blacker than black? #62318
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Lessee… glasses clean — check. No transparency (first thing I thought of, too, although in this case there's no reason it would make a difference).

    As for overprint preview, that's inevitable. You can't be in separations preview mode with it turned off, and you can't turn it off without exiting separations preview. (Try it!)

    The document is a book chapter, thoroughly CMYK, with certficates, blend space and celebrity endorsements to prove it. And I made this illustration grayscale. So that's out.

    It's just odd, and the fact that there's no logic behind it whatsoever tickles my sensible bone, which hasn't talked to my funny bone in years.

    @Bob: Appearance of Black ought not to factor in. Why would it change because one plate (with no coverage) is turned off or on in seps preview? But, for the record, one of the first things I do with a new install is change the defaults to “Accurately”. Print designers who don't do that can make embarrassing mistakes…

    in reply to: Page numbering – Best practices? #62307
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    For books in English, the conventions are well established. You can find lots of detail (possibly more than you ever want to know) in The Chicago Manual of Style under the general heading of book sections, and if you're designing for print you should have a copy on your bookshelf for reference. As far as numbering is concerned, lowercase Roman numerals start at i on the half title page and continue through the whole of the front matter (copyright page, TOC, preface, introduction, etc.). Content numbering begins at 1 on the first page of chapter 1 or, where it applies, the section opener (“Part One: My Adventures in Siberia”) or second half title page.

    Odd numbers are always right-hand (recto) pages, and chapters always start on a recto unless they are specified as a two page spread, in which case page 1 would be a second half title or a section opener on the recto before the first chapter.

    For magazines, the first recto after the cover is usually page 1; newspapers, the front page is page 1; other publications, “it depends.” Academic publications and professional journals usually have very specific style guides that you would follow. For a catalog, you can pretty much roll your own page numbering, provided it's visible and makes sense to the reader.

    in reply to: Pre-press queries #62255
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Not talking to the printer IS a bad idea, but it's becoming unavoidable in some situations (design in one country, printing via a broker on a different continent, client wants it cheap and isn't fussy about color). It's become so cheap to print in Asia and ship back that even some low-budget local printers here in the US are finding it hard to compete when price is the major concern.

    in reply to: How to design a CD pocket on a book cover? #62254
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    The printer is going to cut this using a die, and most printers are happy to supply a template for the designer so they don't have problems at production time. That would be the first thing to try.

    The backup plan is to lay out the piece with the image sized as you have it, allowing at least 7 mm bleed, preferably 10 mm. Add to that a slug of another 10 mm on the three sides that will be glued (not the top). When you export the PDF, include the bleed, crop marks and slug. The printer will still have to figure out what to do with it, but that should be enough “spare” to meet any glueing process I've come across.

    in reply to: CS Review is dead. Long live CS Review! #62253
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    This is part of the Creative Cloud, both viewing and commenting. One caveat is that InDesign and Illustrator files will NOT display correctly if they contain live text (the Cloud will substitute available web fonts, so Zapfino will display as Myriad, etc.).

    For review and comment purposes it's best to stick with PDFs and images.

    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    The problem is that “ignored” is a temporary status. If you close the document and reopen, you'll have to ignore them all over again. Building a set of grep styles all pointing to the same character style is probably the way to go in a situation like this. Then I'd load the text styles from the first (master) document so I could reuse them for new documents with the same product names.

    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    The trial downloads don't go up on the website until the product is actually released. Generally there's a delay of a week or two after release before the trial downloads become available for download.

    in reply to: Page numbering bug in book to PDF conversion in 5.5 #60878
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    Update: I've not seen any evidence of this in any of my CS5 book projects or some tests I just did. Although “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence,” it seems like it was introduced in 5.5 and not earlier.

    in reply to: Page numbering bug in book to PDF conversion in 5.5 #60877
    Alan Gilbertson
    Participant

    It is a really nasty bug, especially in something that should be rock stable by now. It's still not clear from the Adobe forum thread or elsewhere whether this is a CS 5.5-only bug, or if it affects CS5 also.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 179 total)