Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
AaronA
ParticipantAddendum: When clicked they go to proper square appearance, but only until I move the mouse away, at which point they have the default circular radio button appearance again.
[On a side note, in case it helps someone: I encountered a bugaboo with check boxes not toggling off when clicked — ie, a checked box not getting UNchecked when clicked. Once checked, it was permanently that way. This turned out to be due to my having named the buttons with decimals in them, ala 1.a, 1.b, etc. Changing the decimals to dashes fixed that and now they behave normally…]
Addendum 2: And it solved the appearance problem for the check boxes. They no longer look like radio buttons after the renaming, even with preference turned on. But the square radio buttons are still becoming circular, which I don’t want.
AaronA
ParticipantGood idea, David. I hadn’t considered that. I tried opening it in Word 2011 and the text boxes didn’t come through — only the tables did. And Excel 2011 doesn’t offer RTF or .docx export, as far as I can see. I tried changing the extension to .docx; Word didn’t like that and judged the file corrupt.
By the way, in the script above, you can delete the single-line
‘textbox_text’.
It was there just as a debug. And I guess the 2 find/change grep lines could be removed too.AaronA
ParticipantThanks David. Wow, I’m surprised my Google searching doesn’t reveal anyone else having encountered this problem.
Well, I’m working on a fix in case it helps anyone. Here’s an Applescript that dumps contents of all text frames of the active Excel doc into page 1 of the active ID file (paste into Script Editor and hit Enter key to see proper formatting — and change the en dashes in comments into 2 hyphens; this site auto-‘cleaned’ them when I pasted):
set textbox_text to {“”}
tell application “Microsoft Excel”
tell active workbook
repeat with y from 0 to count of sheets
tell sheet y
–get properties of text frame 1
repeat with x from (count of textboxes) to 1 by -1
set textbox_text to textbox_text & caption of textbox x & return & return
end repeat
end tell
end repeat
end tell
end telltextbox_text
tell application “Adobe InDesign CS6”
–Find change needed to add proper paragraph ends where before were forced line breaks
set find grep preferences to nothing
set change grep preferences to nothing
set find text preferences to nothing
set change text preferences to nothing
set find what of find text preferences to “^n” –forced line break from Excel text box
set change to of change text preferences to “^p” –end of paragraphactivate
tell active document
tell page 1
make new text frame with properties {geometric bounds:{2, 1.8, 27, 19.8}, contents:textbox_text as string}
end tell
end tellset myFoundItems to change text
end tell
AaronA
ParticipantNo one knows the answer to this one? Seems like a huge omission if InDesign doesn’t support this.
August 23, 2015 at 5:50 pm in reply to: Place multiple images without an enclosing frame for each? #77501AaronA
ParticipantHi Brian,
Thanks for the tips. My process for this is to use the cmd-shift shortcut while dragging a corner anchor point of the selected group. This scales them all proportionally without needing to type.
Aaron
August 21, 2015 at 3:13 pm in reply to: Place multiple images without an enclosing frame for each? #77493AaronA
ParticipantThat does work, thanks. I was hoping for a way to have them fit from the get-go, but this’ll do.
Now what’s weird is that each one has a link icon at top left; this seems to be file dependent as it’s not happening with another file when I place the same images. Is this a file-specific preference that I’ve missed?
August 21, 2015 at 10:09 am in reply to: Place multiple images without an enclosing frame for each? #77490AaronA
ParticipantHi David,
Wow, I never realized that! Thanks for enlightening me.
No, I’m not getting strokes around the frames. What I’d like, then, is to have the multiple images in a grid at a similar size, but with each frame fitting exactly to its image’s proportions. At least the option to do so. [This is for situations when I’m just putting a batch on the pasteboard to draw from in a design; I’m not wanting to actually have them all grid-aligned in same-sized frames.]
AaronA
ParticipantHi Isidore,
Glad you found the link helpful.RE: your question to Dwayne, if I may jump in:
The key to the extract text is that it would NOT be set to align to the baseline grid. But as long as the (body) text surrounding it DOES align, then I believe the balance of the spread should be fine. Unless you have a very long extract that isn’t surrounded by body text. And in fact the extract could start at the top or fall at the bottom of the main frame; it’s only the first (if at the top), or last (if at the bottom), line, that must align to the grid to keep the baseline alignment of the spread.
Don’t let Tschichold boss you around too much. ; )
AaronA
ParticipantI assume that you’ll want to sometimes align elements to the bottom of your inner text block proportions. So it would make sense that you’d want your last line of text to also align to it. To do this, you’ll have to make the text block height a multiple of your body leading. Otherwise they won’t match up.
You can then view your baseline grid (which you’ve set up in Preferences, right?), and have that start at the top of your inner margin.
As I mentioned before, any text variations (pull quotes, verse, etc.) have to be multiples of your body text leading in order to align to the body text. No way around that. Unless you want just the last line to align, or something like that.
This guy Marcus Garde goes into great detail on classical grids — I guess he was the teacher of the developer of the plug-in Grid Designer Pro. You might find it interesting.
AaronA
ParticipantHi Isidore,
Yes, your body leading must be according to the height of your text frame. (Would the ID did the math for us.)
But you can’t have any variation that you want while keeping to your rules. If you want to align every line, then everything’s gotta be at the same leading, or simply set to ‘align to baseline grid’.
AaronA
ParticipantAgree! Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to shift click on tabs, or simply toggle a ‘select all tabs’ button, then move them all at once by the same increment?
April 25, 2015 at 9:57 am in reply to: Footnotes, and numbered list with character style on number: superscript not applied #74945AaronA
ParticipantGood thought, Dwayne, but nope… the superscripts sit on the baseline only on the footnotes (which employ auto-numbering). Body text using superscript is fine.
(I should add that the footnotes I’m referring to are not true ID footnotes; they are separated from body text in order to span 2 columns. Were they traditional footnotes there’d be no need to apply auto-numbering to the paragraph style.)
April 23, 2015 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Footnotes, and numbered list with character style on number: superscript not applied #74924AaronA
ParticipantI’m pretty late to the conversation, Rhiannon, but I just ran into this same issue for the same reasons (superscript character style applied on auto-numbering in footnotes). I have no idea why the footnote #s take on the size of superscript but sit at the baseline. Same fix as you: new character style with some baseline shift applied.
AaronA
ParticipantIs there no way to continue the flow from a previous frame — onto new pages — using the primary text frames? I mean, without placing a file?
AaronA
ParticipantSame here; using ‘span all’ on a header in my book project causes almost every action to take at least 6 seconds to process. Adobe really needs to allow an option to speed this up – temporarily making all text after a certain page overset or something, until the user gives the OK to process it all.
-
AuthorPosts
