Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sudie
MemberThank you Shone.
I guess my real question is how to maintain the spacing as items evolve during the layout process. I'd like to somehow link, join or attach the two frames so that they might be resized together as a unit. Grouping and ungrouping is tedious and I don't want the frames to be anchored in text.
September 23, 2010 at 9:39 am in reply to: Can I find/change the bullets or numbering that InDesign creates? #57096Sudie
MemberIt is a long story with lots of problems but I have a down and dirty training manual that was created in Word using some features that when brought into InDesign translated to the automatic numbering and bulleting. It is a long doc (56+ pages) and the most expedient way to format the copy was 'find and change' fonts throughout instead of using style sheets.
I never use the auto numbering/bulleting feature in InDesign so was unfamiliar with how it worked. I ended up eliminating the feature by converting them to text so that I could do a find/change. Ended up being very tedious. The project was doomed from the start but is now off to the printer.
Many, many thanks to StewB for pointing out the 'convert to text' buried within the Type menu. Wish there was a keyboard shortcut for it!
Sudie
MemberI'm using the function under: Type > Bulleted & Numbered Lists > Apply Bullets.
InDesign creates the affect. Paragraph or character styles don't change the end result.
I do have a screen shot but cannot figure out how to attach/insert. Sorry.
Sudie
MemberThank you Eugene but here is the challenge. The applied bullets in InDesgin does not seem to generate an actual character so it would mean going through every instance and adding a bullet. These bullets run though 58 pages (and counting) of this doc.
Does anyone know if there is a way to search for these intangible bullets so I could replace with something that is more controllable?
The better question is probably what affects the appearance of these 'bullets'? All of the attributes (point size, font, etc.) are identical but the end product appears to be smaller.
Sudie
MemberThank you David, so simple and obvious but I knew there was a step I was missing. Your suggested produced the expected result.
SH
-
AuthorPosts
