Oh, I’m so glad we’re having this discussion because it reminds me to finish an article on this very subject that I’m writing with Claudia McCue.
Dwayne: Book publishers are notorious for being very slow to evolve, especially in technology. Printers are second.
Tom: your logic that ” images should be converted to CMYK and .TIF because that is a Postscript RIP’s natural language” is faulty. Neither CMYK nor TIF are natural languages to PostScript. I’ve been programming in PostScript since 1989, and I can tell you that this is one of those “urban legends” that should be ignored.
You are totally overdoing. There is NO reason to convert to CMYK in most cases, and there is certainly no reason to use TIF in most cases (as opposed to PSD, or even JPEG!). See https://creativepro.com/tiff-vs-psd-vs-eps-vs-pdf-vs.php
There are a few cases when converting to CMYK makes sense, but they’re the exception, not the rule. If you ask 10 expert trainers in the field, 9 of them will agree with me and 1 will say “Dang it, we’ve always converted to CMYK, so that’s what I keep telling people to do. Hey, kid, get off my lawn!” And it’s been this way for 10 years.
Now I need to be clear about one really important thing here: I am not necessarily saying you should send RGB to your printer! I do not send InDesign documents and my images to the printer. I send them finished PDF files. And those PDF files are sometimes CMYK and sometimes RGB. The key is that I let InDesign do the conversion to CMYK (and to the correct CMYK) when I export the PDF.
There’s nothing wrong with converting to CMYK and using TIFF and all that if you work by the hour or you’re just stubborn and crusty. Or there is some actual scientific reason to do so, which is possible, but unlikely.