Back

If your email is not recognized and you believe it should be, please contact us.

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.Login

Best practices for new catalog

Return to Member Forum

  • Author
    Posts
    • #55564
      BevNap
      Participant

      We are switching from Quark to InDesign for our product catalog. We have many small products on a page. I'm looking for any suggestions on how to best setup a document. I'm very new to InDesign and appreciate any expertise you are willing to share! Here's a link to our current catalog. https://www.idline.com/catalog

    • #55566
      erickp
      Member

      You're question is very general but I suppose you would carry over your best practices from Quark to InDesign. I'm in the middle of a 200pg catalog with hundreds and hundreds of parts (photos & charts). The last catalog was less than two years ago and was created in Quark. Don't ask me why but I inherited that way form the previous designer. I rebuilt this new catalog in InDesign (Thank GOD!!!). If there is anything specific you'd like to know, feel free to ask away.

      PS-> Not bashing Quark above, since I've used Quark for MANY years but for me InDesign is a Godsend.

      ~erick

    • #55568
      BevNap
      Participant

      Thanks Erick. One question I have is on drop shadows. Since I've never used PSD files in Quark (I always put all the smaller images into one large image for ease of file management). Would it be best to use the drop shadows from Photoshop or create drop shadows in InDesign for the individual images? I'm hoping to like InDesign soon. I've used AI/PS for many years and didn't think the switch would be difficult… I'm also a long time Quark user.

    • #55570
      erickp
      Member

      Before I address the “drop shadow” question, I will say that I personally wouldn't create one large file for all the smaller images. Every image/product should be it's own file with it's own unique files name (preferable the product/part #). It allows to identify each product not only in your InDesign document but also in your files structure. I sort of equate it to doing a 500pg. catalog as one big ID file. That's putting your eggs in one basket and if something God forbid goes wrong, it can be costly. Plus, you avoid images shifting within the frame and products not displaying correctly within your picture box. Yes, it might be easier doing it your way but in the end you might set yourself up for frustration in the event that one of those large files containing all the small images becomes corrupt. Of-course, that's just me and I'm pretty anal about file structure and organization. Don't know if that's good or bad? LOL!

      As far as drop shadows go, InDesign does a great job with drop shadows and I don't see anything wrong with it BUT I would always advise to create your drop shadows in Photoshop. Heck, I would even suggest rotating any images that need rotating in PS instead of within ID. Do I follow my own advice, well, no. LOL! I do most of the time but occasionally I do use the drop shadow feature within ID and haven't had a problem with to date. I'm speaking from more of an old school mentality and many of these rules become non-issues as the technology improves and all these applications start to meld into each other. The Adobe CS suites is a perfect example of it all coming together.

      Hope this helps!

      ~erick

    • #55610
      BevNap
      Participant

      Thanks again Erick for your insight. Trying to break out of my “that's how I've always done it” mentality! I like the idea of splitting the catalog into sections. I've always been partial to the drop shadows in Photoshop as well.

      Do any of us follow our own advice? LOL

      Bev

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • The forum ‘General InDesign Topics (CLOSED)’ is closed to new topics and replies.
Forum Ads